The great thing about running is that it is a sport in which almost everybody already has what is necessary to participate. If you can walk, you can run. You don’t need to spend a cent. You don’t have to buy a whole bunch of ‘stuff’ to be a runner. Ironically, we can ‘just do it’ without having to spend a fortune on all sorts of branded gear and equipment.This suits me to a tee, because I’m not really a gadget guy. I don’t feel compelled to have the latest gizmo all the time. When I do purchase something, it’s usually after a lot of careful deliberation and a determination that while it may not necessarily be essential, it may be helpful.
So, after I started running seriously a few years ago, it took me a little while before I started investing in better shoes, and shorts and t-shirts made from technical fabrics. Not essential, but helpful.
At the start of 2007, I was given a second generation, 2GB iPod Nano I would never have gone out and purchased one of these, but I’m glad I was given it., because after I loaded a bunch of my favourite songs on it and started to take it out running, I loved it.
2007 was the year that I also started ramping up my training to do my first half marathon. I started keeping a detailed running log using a basic excel spreadsheet template I downloaded for free from here, (I still use this log and have one for each of the last four years). I used my car to measure the distance for a number of different routes I was using, then used my watch to time myself over those distances. However, to keep my log accurate meant I could only run the routes I had measured out prior. I needed the freedom to vary my runs whilst maintaining an accurate record of them.
I started to read about GPS devices like the Garmin Forerunner but with their price tag, (up against a mortgage and two kids) I couldn’t justify the purchase and reconcile it on the ‘not essential, but helpful scale’.
Then along came the Nike+.
For a fraction of the price of a Garmin, I could purchase a foot-sensor and attachment for the Nano I already had. The Nike+ is essentially an accelerometer that, when calibrated correctly, estimates speed and distance over time. The foot-sensor is designed to go into a specially designed Nike shoe (which I wasn’t going to get!), so I purchased an all-weather pouch to mount it on the laces of my existing running shoes. The sensor communicates wirelessly to the Nano where the screen shows your speed, distance covered and average pace. The recorded details are then uploaded via iTunes to the Nike+ website where your runs are graphed and where you can participate in an online community to encourage and/or challenge other runners. There are also other non-Nike sites like Runner+ and Buckeye Outdoors which offer greater flexibility and freedom to interact with other runners who use the Nike+.
The Nike+ is relatively inexpensive (mine cost me around AUD$45). I generally like the online community, the encouragement and the challenges, the ability to keep a slightly more accurate record of my runs and the freedom to run wherever I want, but the downsides of the Nike+ are numerous.
While I’ve come close, I’ve never been able to achieve a really accurate calibration. Occasionally the calibration is lost completely, or alters slightly from run to run – on two recent track sessions, I measured a 100m difference in the lap length from one session to the next. Because it’s based on the Nano, it doesn’t work well in humid weather or in the rain. Sometimes when I go to pause the Nike+ on a long run the buttons stick and rather than pausing the run it ends it and I have to start it up from zero again. It’s no good for interval training as it doesn’t seem to keep pace with sprints and strides. The Nike+ website is slow and ponderous to navigate and doesn’t lend itself well to the sort of social networking that can be achieved on sites like runnerplus and Daily Mile. The battery in the sensor ran out within a year and I had to purchase a replacement. This second sensor’s battery has been going now for almost two years – go figure! It has been a love/hate relationship.
Nevertheless, it has served me fairly well to this point. But with my goal this year of running a marathon, and with working to a very detailed training plan that requires much more accuracy than can be provided by the Nike+, I think it’s time to move onwards and upwards and get a GPS-based device (and I reckon my 40th birthday might be a pretty good excuse for a rare indulgence in a new gadget).
Anyone else used the Nike+? How have you found it? What about other devices? What do you recommend?
I used the Nike+ for a couple years and had much the same experience as you. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't great either. Then last year I got an iPhone, and I found RunKeeper. This app (which has a free and a pro version) uses the iPhone's GPS to track you and syncs the data to a website. I like the idea of carrying a phone with me anyway for safety, so it works well. I can listen to music, track my run, and snap the occasional photograph all with the same device. I upgraded to the Pro version after a few months, which has some nice additional features (such as interval training). The website doesn't have "challenge" functionality yet, but I think it's coming. The development team are really good about adding new features. If you're in any way thinking of getting an iPhone, this app is a massive incentive.
ReplyDeleteHi Kris, thanks for dropping by, and for the comment. Runkeeper does look good, but don't you find the iPhone bulky to carry around on a run?
ReplyDeleteMy work requires me to carry my phone always, and for a while it served as my media player. I use both the Garmin 305 and the Nike+ systems (geeky-fitness-overkill) I love the nike community and challenges, that's what keeps me at the site. The Garmin though really helps analyze my runs as it maps heart rate, location, speed. I used it to calibrate the Nike sensor and now they are both pretty accurate. BTW Sydney is a lovely town, my son married a Sydney girl and now lives in the Beverly Hills area. I love your country and still think that Cape Tribulation/Daintree forest is the most beautiful patch of land on the planet. Cheers from Seattle
ReplyDeleteHey Sam, yep - the Garmin 305 is the gizmo I have my eyes on. Though I'm not going to think its the end all and be all... check out this hilarious post from the Run Faster Mommy! blog:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.runfastermommy.com/2010/03/coach-envy.html
And using both gadgets doesn't seem to be doing you any harm at all in the Nike+ challenge stakes!!
Honestly it's a little bulky, but I really don't mind. I have a case that snaps shut around it like a wallet, and it's not that cumbersome. I'm used to it now. There are arm bands though too, I think.
ReplyDeleteConsistently I couldn't get mine to calibrate no matter what I did. I guess it shows how inconsistent my pace is due to the hills where I run. I got a refurb'd garmin for a reduced price and never looked back.
ReplyDeleteI used a Nike+ for quite a while, while having the same peeves about it as you do. With me doing more and more training I finally succumbed to buying a Garmin 405CX some time back. I must say I love it. Still: I keep running with the Ipod and Nike+ on every run. It's a back-up in case something goes wrong with the Garmin during the run, and I am still a sucker for the challenges on the Nike+ site. Running with both only makes the shortcomings of the Nike+ shine more though. Yesterday I ran a 10k in 47:21 according to the Garmin, the Nike+ made me run 50 seconds longer to finish. I have found the Nike+ is accurate for me at a pace of 5:10/km. Any faster and the Nike+ measures distances low. Any slower and it measures high. Still: it's an inexpensive piece of kit, and brought me huge amounts of motivation when I first started out. When I switched to the Garmin I friend told me you have just graduated from a toy that's good for beginners to a real tool. Though harsh, I think that's right.
ReplyDeleteJirnsum, thanks for the comment. I think you've nailed it - I find the same thing with the 5:10 pace, and I think I'll probably be having a hard time letting go of the Nike+ challenges as well. I can see myself running with multiple gadgets if/when I get a Garmin to wean myself off it! In an earlier comment, Kris said that the Nike+ is good, but not great and I think that's the best summary for it. If we want to get more serious, then we need a device that's going to support us, not frustrate us!
ReplyDeleteI went straight from a HRM to a Garmin. Though I wear Nike shoes and most of them have the "+", I think I did not get the module because I don't carry an Ipod. (No music on my runs, thank you.)
ReplyDeleteSame experience as most everyone else with the Nike+. I like the challenge features, but its accuracy is way off most of the time. I started using RunKeeper as well (I'm actually nerdy enough to run both Nike+ and Runkeeper at the same time). I love Runkeeper! And I carry the iPhone in a belt around my waist. The belt is made by Tune Belt (or something like that) in case you are interested in going that route. Nice thing about Nike+ with the iphone is that it does let you calibrate at the end of every run... but I'll probably still drop the Nike+ sometime soon. They say that there are some cool features coming later this year, however.
ReplyDeleteLoree, Being able to calibrate at the end of every run with the iphone would seem to make a big difference. I ran a 10k race on Saturday and my Nike+ knocked off over 500 metres! If I know I'm running a certified distance, it should be able to be recalibrated after a run like that, and not just on the iphone. Anyway, it sounds like you're pretty sold on RunKeeper! Thanks for dropping by.
ReplyDeleteWell this is interesting! Thought I was losing my marbles...I'd calibrate and re-calibrate. I'd also run like the wind, end my work out only to see that the pace was like a slug hitching a ride on a slower slug. Think I'll save up for a garmin :)
ReplyDelete